The wave equation and the vibrating string controversy
A partial differential equation for the vibration of a stretched string and a mathematical dispute about what is to count as a function at all.
The Frenchman Jean d'Alembert wrote the equation in 1747 and solved it in general form through two arbitrary functions. The Swiss Leonhard Euler allowed as a solution a curve drawn free-hand, and Daniel Bernoulli gave the solution as a sum of sines; d'Alembert insisted on a single analytic expression for the whole string.
The dispute over admissible functions took several decades and prepared both the generalisation of the concept of function itself and the expansion of arbitrary functions in trigonometric series.
Why this date
The date taken is 1747: d'Alembert's memoir belongs to the Berlin Academy volume "for the year 1747" (vol. 3, pp. 214-219), yet the volume itself was printed later, and catalogues differ between 1749 and 1750. The dispute went on afterwards: Euler's reply in 1748, Daniel Bernoulli's series solution in 1753. In print this is the first appearance of the wave equation specifically, and not the first partial differential equation at all: Cajori dates clear examples of such equations to 1719 in Nicolaus Bernoulli and to Euler's work of 1734.
What it grew from
-
Differential and integral calculus
influenced · Confidence: medium
The wave equation is written in partial derivatives, that is, it grew out of the differential calculus extended to functions of several variables: that apparatus itself took shape after 1684, and clear examples of such equations are known from 1719 onwards.
Link sources
- Jesper Lützen, Euler's Vision of a General Partial Differential Calculus for a Generalized Kind of Function, Mathematics Magazine 56 (5), Sherlock Holmes in Babylon, MAA, 354-360 (1983) Verified 20 Sep 2026
the type of functions which could be allowed in analysis, particularly in the new partial differential calculus
- Florian Cajori, The Early History of Partial Differential Equations and of Partial Differentiation and Integration, American Mathematical Monthly 35 (9), 459-467 (1928) Verified 20 Sep 2026
Partial differential equations stand out clearly in six examples on trajectories published in 1719 by Nicolaus Bernoulli
"Verified" means that on that day the quotation was found at the address given, word for word. No date means we have not been able to open the source yet, not that the quotation is wrong.
- Jesper Lützen, Euler's Vision of a General Partial Differential Calculus for a Generalized Kind of Function, Mathematics Magazine 56 (5), Sherlock Holmes in Babylon, MAA, 354-360 (1983) Verified 20 Sep 2026
Node sources
- Jean d'Alembert, biography, MacTutor History of Mathematics (2023) Verified 20 Sep 2026
first appearance of the wave equation in print
- Israel Kleiner, Evolution of the Function Concept: A Brief Survey, The College Mathematics Journal 20 (4), 282-300 (1989) Verified 20 Sep 2026
Of crucial importance for the subsequent evolution of the concept of the function was the Vibrating-String Problem
- Elizabeth Garber, Vibrating Strings and Eighteenth-Century Mechanics, 2 The Language of Physics, Birkhäuser (1999) Verified 20 Sep 2026
The issues were the nature of legitimate mathematical functions, the definition of continuity, and differentiability.
- Florian Cajori, The Early History of Partial Differential Equations and of Partial Differentiation and Integration, American Mathematical Monthly 35 (9), 459-467 (1928) Verified 20 Sep 2026
Partial differential equations stand out clearly in six examples on trajectories published in 1719 by Nicolaus Bernoulli
- Jean Le Rond D'Alembert, Recherches sur la courbe que forme une corde tendue mise en vibration, Histoire de l'Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres de Berlin, 214-219 (1747) Verified 20 Sep 2026
Recherches sur la courbe que forme une corde tendue mise en vibration
"Verified" means that on that day the quotation was found at the address given, word for word. No date means we have not been able to open the source yet, not that the quotation is wrong.